Thanks for the report! The earlier Orange Pi 5 results were provided atI see that you do not have Orange Pi 5 plus listed. It appears to be slightly faster than opi5. These are the resuts:Code:
hrvoje@opi5p:~/Build/pichart-current/pichart-40$ ./pichart-serial pichart -- Raspberry Pi Performance Serial version 40Prime Sieve P=14630843 Workers=2 Sec=1.33191 Mops=701.493Merge Sort N=16777216 Workers=2 Sec=2.23231 Mops=180.375Fourier Transform N=4194304 Workers=2 Sec=0.842189 Mflops=547.826Lorenz 96 N=32768 K=16384 Workers=2 Sec=0.503007 Mflops=6403.94My Computer has Raspberry Pi ratio=22.92Making pie charts...done.hrvoje@opi5p:~/Build/pichart-current/pichart-40$ ./pichart-openmp pichart -- Raspberry Pi Performance OPENMP version 40Prime Sieve P=14630843 Workers=8 Sec=0.248205 Mops=3764.35Merge Sort N=16777216 Workers=16 Sec=0.357519 Mops=1126.24Fourier Transform N=4194304 Workers=16 Sec=0.287439 Mflops=1605.12Lorenz 96 N=32768 K=16384 Workers=4 Sec=0.137461 Mflops=23433.7My Computer has Raspberry Pi ratio=99.7837Making pie charts...done.hrvoje@opi5p:~/Build/pichart-current/pichart-40$
viewtopic.php?p=2117184#p2117184
In that post it was claimed the simpler RK3588S was manufactured using a 6nm process while the RK3588 in the plus uses 7nm. My impression is they should perform the same provided the clock speeds are the same.
I wonder if the speed improvement results from a newer C compiler rather than hardware differences. The performance differences could also also result from memory allocations with unlucky cache-line alignment or noise from various Linux background tasks.
Statistics: Posted by ejolson — Mon Sep 16, 2024 8:37 pm