Quantcast
Channel: Raspberry Pi Forums
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4919

Advanced users • Re: Best practice to set up armhf container image

$
0
0
Thanks, but that's not actually what I am after.
Maybe I'm confused, but in the OP you said "...or from the IMG file." Apologies if I misunderstood.
I know about the kernel= line in config.txt, but always good to be reminded about the 4K/16K pagesize - it is a sticking point.

What I want to do is have the container's root FS on a folder somewhere, rather than an IMG file, so it's more about how to get from the IMG file, or an SD card, and what (if anything) I could prune from it as it won't be needed, even if I use the -b option.
You do know that you can use systemd-nspawn with a directory rather than an IMG, right? sdm can do this using systemd-nspawn:

Code:

pw/ssdy/work$ ls -l /ssdy/work/test/sdmtotal 64lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    7 Jul  3 17:04 bin -> usr/bindrwxr-xr-x  3 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:14 bootdrwxr-xr-x  4 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 devdrwxr-xr-x 89 root root 4096 Aug  8 09:02 etcdrwxr-xr-x  3 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:05 homelrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    7 Jul  3 17:04 lib -> usr/liblrwxrwxrwx  1 root root   25 Aug  8 09:02 lib64 -> usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnudrwx------  2 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:13 lost+founddrwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 mediadrwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 mntdrwxr-xr-x  3 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:06 optdrwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 procdrwx------  3 root root 4096 Aug  8 09:02 rootdrwxr-xr-x  8 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 runlrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    8 Jul  3 17:04 sbin -> usr/sbindrwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 srvdrwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Mar 29 10:20 sysdrwxrwxrwt  2 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 tmpdrwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 usrdrwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Jul  3 17:04 varpw/ssdy/work$ sudo sdm --explore --directory /ssdy/work/test/sdm* Enter Directory '/ssdy/work/test/sdm'# NOTE: Now running in the systemd-nspawn container using the directory treeroot@sdm:/# root@sdm:/# root@sdm:/# ls -a.  ..  bin  boot  dev  etc  home  lib  lib64  lost+found  media  mnt  opt  proc  root  run  sbin  srv  sys  tmp  usr  varroot@sdm:/# 
If I used an IMG, while it would limit the amount of space I needed, it might also constrain what I was doing for that reason, typically running a build.
Yes, but similarly you can run out of disk space on the SD card when using a directory tree with systemd-nspawn. No difference. Just extend the IMG as needed before you use a disk-hungry operation. Of course, you're still limited by the size of the disk.
I am considering having a lite OS image running on the hardware directly (with systemd-container installed, then having two containers, a lite-64 build environment, and a lite-32 build environment.

Presumably, the container FS images can be backed up/restored with no ill-effects (provided they are inactive at the time!)?
Yes, of course, as long as systemd-nspawn is not active on the container. It's just a collection of files...

Statistics: Posted by bls — Wed Sep 04, 2024 6:15 pm



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4919

Trending Articles