Primarily financial risk but it also buffers liability against the charity's trustees, every charity I am involved in has a limited liability company to ensure the charity's funds and charity owners are protected, as much as possible is done through the commercial arms.
Until the final IPO offer, RPF can asset strip whatever they like from RPL including the bank balance and the trade mark If I was in RPF's shoes I would be holding tightly onto the trade mark but on the other hand, if they achieve sufficient funds from the IPO I guess their name no longer matters as they will have transitioned away from raising money from their trading arm's customers.
Obviously at the moment the relationship between RPF and RPL is at the least fairly amicable, that might not always be the case.
I've not read the IPO documentation, the terms and conditions to access them preclude me.
Until the final IPO offer, RPF can asset strip whatever they like from RPL including the bank balance and the trade mark If I was in RPF's shoes I would be holding tightly onto the trade mark but on the other hand, if they achieve sufficient funds from the IPO I guess their name no longer matters as they will have transitioned away from raising money from their trading arm's customers.
Obviously at the moment the relationship between RPF and RPL is at the least fairly amicable, that might not always be the case.
I've not read the IPO documentation, the terms and conditions to access them preclude me.
Statistics: Posted by pidd — Sun May 26, 2024 8:22 pm